Conductors
The Physics Hypertextbook™
© 1998-2008 by Glenn Elert -- A Work in Progress
All Rights Reserved -- Fair Use Encouraged
prev | up | next
Discussion
introduction
Static charge moves to the outside. This sounds stupid, "static charge moves".
Field is zero on the inside. Faraday cage, electrostatic shielding, etc.
Field perpendicular to surface.
Charge collects at points. This leads to a phenomena known as corona discharge.
"Corona" from the latin word for crown.

Corona Discharge from a Wire
Corona discharge is a useful way to passively eliminate charge.
| Lightning Rods … |
 |
 |
| on an Airplane Wing |
on an Electric Power Substation |
text
Summary
- Charge on a conductor …
- arranges itself so that the field has zero magnitude everywhere within
- arranges itself so that the field is always perpendicular to the surface
- collects on the surface
- concentrates on points
Problems
practice
- Two metal spheres are electrically charged. One of them carries
+6 μC and the other −12 μC. The two spheres
are carefully brought in contact and then separated. What
is the new charge on each sphere if …
- the spheres are the same size
- the positive sphere has twice the radius of the negative sphere
Solutions …
- With two spheres of equal size, the total charge will try to distribute itself
evenly between them.The positive charges are repelled by one another and
try to get as far apart as possible. The negative charges behave the same
way. They best strategy for maximizing separation is to send half your
members to one sphere and half to the other. Since neither sphere is more
"attractive" than the other, the split should be an even one. On the whole, we have …
| |
| Qnet = (+6 μC) + (−12 μC) = −6 μC |
| |
of charge to slit evenly into …
| |
|
|
| Q1 = Q2 = |
−6 μC |
= −3 μC |
| 2 |
| |
|
|
for each sphere.
- If you were a charge, running away from the other charges and you had to
decide between two conductors of different size, which would you choose?
Well, you can't all choose the bigger one because then you'd be closer
together than if some of you chose the big one and some the small one.
Would you divide up evenly? No, that doesn't make much sense either. The
small sphere would be pack tight and the big one would have unused capacity
for holding charge. No, the "logical" conclusion in the minds of our anthropomorphic
charges is to distribute themselves at arm's length against the outside
of each sphere. The next thing to do is test the common wisdom with mathematics.
The quantity that determines the motion of charges is voltage -- potential
difference, that is. Charge will flow from high potential to low potential
in much the same way that water flows from regions of high altitude to
regions of low altitude. Our two charged spheres are like two lakes. Putting
the spheres in contact is like connecting two lakes with an aqueduct. The
higher one (higher in altitude) will drain away into the lower one until
both lakes are at the same level. Similarly, our two charged spheres will
exchange charge until they both reach the same voltage.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| V1 = V2 |
⇒ |
kq1 |
= |
kq2 |
⇒ |
q1 |
= |
q2 |
| r1 |
r2 |
2r |
r |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the same time, charge must be conserved. We started with −6 μC overall and so we shall end. Mathematically, we write this as …
| |
|
|
| q1 + q2 = −6 μC |
⇒ |
q2 = −6 μC − q1 |
| |
|
|
All that remains is to combine the two equations and solve for the two unknowns.
| |
|
|
| q1 |
= |
−6 μC − q1 |
| 2r |
r |
| |
|
|
| q1 |
= |
−12 μC − 2q1 |
| 3q1 |
= |
−12 μC |
| |
|
|
| q1 |
= |
−4 μC |
| q2 |
= |
−2 μC |
| |
|
|
Well whad'ya know. The one that's twice as big (has twice the radius) can
hold twice as much charge. That makes sense.
- Write something.
- Two conducting spheres are concentrically nested as shown in the cross-sectional
diagram below. The inner sphere has a diameter of 3 cm and a net charge
of +12 μC. The outer spherical shell has an inner diameter of 6 cm,
an outer diameter of 8 cm, and a net charge of −6 μC.
- Determine the net charge on the …
- inner surface of the outer spherical shell
- outer surface of the outer spherical shell
- Complete the following table.
distance from center (cm) |
electric field (MV/m) |
electric potential (MV) |
| direction |
magnitude |
sign |
magnitude |
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
- Sketch the following quantities as functions of distance from 0 to 10 cm.
- magnitude of the electric field
- electric potential
Solution …
- The charge will distribute itself so as to "screen out" the
electric field within the hollow sphere. There will be just as much charge
on the inside of the surface as there is on the nested sphere with the
total charge adding up to −6 μC. Thus there must be …
- −12 μC of charge on the inner surface and …
- +6 μC of charge on the outer surface.
- Now that we know the charge distribution we can determine the electric
field by repeated application of Gauss' law. Imagine a spherical
Gaussian surface concentric with the nested spheres and watch its radius
vary from 0 to 10 cm.
| |
| ∯ E · dA = |
Q |
⇒ |
E (4πr2) = |
Q |
⇒ |
E = |
1 |
|
Q |
= |
kQ |
| ε0 |
ε0 |
4πε0 |
r2 |
r2 |
| |
For the first 3 cm the Gaussian sphere contains no charge, which
means there is no electric field. That's the way it works in a conductor.
There can be no field inside a conductor once the charges find their
equilibrium distribution.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
= |
| (9.0 × 109 N m2/C2)(0 C) |
| r[m]2 |
|
= |
0 V/m |
(0 cm to 3 cm) |
| |
| When the radius reaches 3 cm the Gaussian sphere
finally contains some charge |
| |
| Qnet = +12 μC |
| |
| No additional charge makes it into the Gaussian sphere
for awhile. |
| |
| |
|
= |
| (9.0 × 109 N m2/C2)(+12 × 10−6 C) |
| r[m]2 |
|
= |
|
(3 cm to 6 cm) |
| |
| When the radius reaches 6 cm, the Gaussian surface
contains no net charge again. |
| |
| Qnet = (+12 μC) + (−12 μC) = 0 μC |
| |
| No charge, no field. (Or is it the other way round?) |
| |
| |
|
= |
| (9.0 × 109 N m2/C2)(0 C) |
| r[m]2 |
|
= |
0 V/m |
(6 cm to 8 cm) |
| |
| When the Gaussian surface makes it to the outside
of the outer sphere, the net charge is nonzero once again. This
time it's |
| |
| Qnet = (+12 μC) + (−6 μC) = +6 μC |
| |
| Thus … |
| |
| |
|
= |
| (9.0 × 109 N m2/C2)(+6 × 10−6 C) |
| r[m]2 |
|
= |
|
(8 cm to ∞) |
| |
| Numbers in. Answers out. See the table below for
the summary of all this talk. By the way, the positive signs in
the answers tell us that the field is directed radially outward
in the places where it exists. |
| |
| Now, on to the potential. In this problem, it's best
to compute electric potential from the electric field using the
mutated form of the work-energy theorem. Imagine a small, positive
test charge. Drag it from infinity to any point a distance r from
the center of the spheres. The work per unit charge is the electric
potential and the force per unit charge is the field. |
| |
r |
|
|
r |
| V = − |
⌠ ⌡ |
E ·dr |
⇐ |
U = − |
⌠ ⌡ |
F ·dr |
| |
∞ |
|
|
∞ |
|
| Apply this formula in a piecewise manner, noting
the discontinuities in the electric field at the surfaces of the
conductors. Work from the "outside in" as is the
custom with potentials. |
| |
| For the space surrounding the outer sphere we get … |
| |
|
= |
| (9.0 × 109 N m2/C2)(+6 × 10−6 C) |
| r[m] |
|
= |
|
(8 cm to ∞) |
| Electric potential in a conductor is the same everywhere,
is the same as the potential at the last place it was computable
-- the surface. |
| |
| |
0.08 m |
| V = − |
⌠ ⌡ |
kQ |
dr |
| r2 |
| |
∞ |
|
= |
| (9.0 × 109 N m2/C2)(+6 × 10−6 C) |
| 0.08 m |
|
= |
0.675 MV |
(6 cm to 8 cm) |
| Now, in the gap between the conductors we see the
first application of piecewise integration. |
| |
0.08 m |
|
0.06 m |
|
r |
| V = − |
⌠ ⌡ |
E ·dr |
− |
⌠ ⌡ |
E ·dr |
− |
⌠ ⌡ |
E ·dr |
| |
∞ |
|
0.08 m |
|
0.06 m |
|
| V = + |
0.675 MV |
+ |
0 MV |
+ |
kQ |
⎡ ⎣ |
1 |
− |
1 |
⎤ ⎦ |
| r[m] |
0.06 m |
|
| |
| V = + 0.675 MV + 0.108 MVm |
⎡ ⎣ |
1 |
− |
1 |
⎤ ⎦ |
(3 cm to 6 cm) |
| r[m] |
0.06 m |
|
| |
My, that was unpleasant.
We finish by evaluating this last expression at 3 cm. That's the
potential from the surface of the inner sphere all the way to the center.
| |
| V = + 0.675 MV + 0.108 MVm |
⎡ ⎣ |
1 |
− |
1 |
⎤ ⎦ |
= 2.475 MV (0 cm to 3 cm) |
| 0.03 m |
0.06 m |
| |
Once again, check the table below for the results of all this work.
distance from center (cm) |
electric field (MV/m) |
electric potential (MV) |
| direction |
magnitude |
sign |
magnitude |
| 0 |
n/a |
0 |
+ |
2.475 |
| 1 |
n/a |
0 |
+ |
2.475 |
| 2 |
n/a |
0 |
+ |
2.475 |
| 3 |
n/a, out |
0, 120 |
+ |
2.475 |
| 4 |
out |
67.5 |
+ |
1.575 |
| 5 |
out |
43.2 |
+ |
1.035 |
| 6 |
out, n/a |
30.0, 0 |
+ |
0.675 |
| 7 |
n/a |
0 |
+ |
0.675 |
| 8 |
n/a, out |
0, 8.44 |
+ |
0.675 |
| 9 |
out |
6.67 |
+ |
0.600 |
| 10 |
out |
5.40 |
+ |
0.540 |
- And lastly, graphs of …
- magnitude of the electric field
- electric potential
- Write something completely different.
conceptual
- Read the following passages from Benjamin Franklin.
| |
| In September 1752, I erected an Iron Rod to draw the Lightning down
into my House, in order to make some Experiments on it, with two
Bells to give Notice when the Rod should be electrify'd. A contrivance
obvious to every Electrician.
|
| |
| In Philadelphia I had such a rod fixed to the top of my chimney, and
extending about nine feet above it. From the foot of this rod, a wire
(the thickness of a goose-quill) came through a covered glass tube
in the roof, and down through the well of the staircase; the lower
end connected with the iron spear of a pump. On the staircase opposite
too my chamber door, the wire was divided; the ends separated about
six inches, a little bell on each end; and between the bells a little
brass ball, suspended by a silk thread, to play between and strike
the bells when clouds passed with electricity in them.
|
| [extend these quotes] |
| |
Here are a few portraits of Franklin seated besides his device. If you
look very closely [magnify] you can see the "little brass ball suspended by
a silk thread" between the bells.
- When a storm cloud passes overhead, the bells become charged opposite
each other. Explain why this happens
- When the bells become charged, the brass ball will bounce back
and forth between the two bells. Explain why this happens.
- What could this device be used for?
- Why don't you have one in your home today?
Resources
- faraday cage
- High Power Job, glumbert.com (fascinating short video where, surprisingly, no one dies)
- lightning
- Fatal Attraction, New Scientist. 09 February 2002
- Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) About Lightning, Kerry Anderson, Canadian Forest Service
- Hello. My name is Sabrina. I was struck by lightning.
- Lightning, Ron Hipschman, Exploratorium
- Lightning, Vincent Mallette, Inwit Publishing
- Lightning and Atmospheric Electricity, Global Hydrology and Climate Center, NASA
- Lightning Injury Research, Mary Ann Cooper, University of Illinois at Chicago
- Lightning Strike & Electric Shock Survivors International (LSESSI)
- National Lightning Safety Institute
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
- lightning rod
prev | up | next