Conservation of Energy
The Physics Hypertextbook™
© 1998-2008 by Glenn Elert -- A Work in Progress
All Rights Reserved -- Fair Use Encouraged
prev | up | next
Discussion
The law of conservation of energy cannot be derived. Energy is not concrete;
it is not a material substance; it is given meaning through the calculation
of numbers. A true historical discussion of the law of conservation of energy
is best left to the chapters in this book devoted to thermodynamics. The
Nineteenth Century law of conservation of energy of Mayer and von Helmholtz
(and Clausius, Carnot, Rumford, Kelvin, and maybe some more). For now,
just take it as a really good idea.
The term energy was introduced in the 1850s by William Thomson (Lord Kelvin)
and William Rankine. (Really?)
Summary
Problems
practice
- The diagram below shows a 10,000 kg bus traveling on a straight road which rises and falls. The horizontal
dimension has been foreshortened. The speed of the bus at point A is 26.82 m/s
(60 mph). The engine has been disengaged and the bus is coasting. Friction
and air resistance are assumed negligible. The numbers on the left show the
altitude above sea level in meters. The letters A-F correspond to points
on the road at these altitudes.
- Find the speed of the bus at point B.
- An extortionist has planted a bomb on the bus. If the speed of the
bus falls below 22.35 m/s (50 mph) the bomb will explode. Will
the speed of the bus fall below this value and explode? If you feel the
bus will explode, identify the interval in which this occurs.
- Derive a formula to determine the speed of the bus at any altitude.
Solutions …
- Answer it.
-
Two 64 kg stick figures are performing a stunt as the diagram to the
right shows.
One stick figure stands atop an 7.0 m escarpment. A second stick figure
stands on a light, inflexible beam balanced over large rock. The first stick
figure rolls a 256 kg boulder off the edge of the escarpment towards
the iron beam. (Warning: These are professional stunt stick figures. Don't
try this at home.)
- What is the theoretical limit on the height to which the second stick
figure can rise? Assume that stick figures obey the law of conservation
of energy.
- Describe how the design of this stunt alone will prevent the second
stick figure from reaching the theoretical limit. Friction, air resistance,
and the likelihood that either the beam or the stick figure will break
are minor factors.
Solutions …
- Answer it.
- Write something different.
- Write something completely different.
conceptualexc
- Four identical balls are thrown from the top of a cliff, each with
the same speed. The first is thrown straight
up, the second is thrown at 30° above the horizontal, the third at 30°
below he horizontal, and the fourth straight down. How do the
speeds and kinetic energies of the balls compare as they strike the ground …
- when air resistance is negligible?
- when air resistance is significant?
numerical
- A 940 W motor is used to lift 200 kg of supplies 11 m
above street level to the roof of a building.
- If the motor ran for 24 s how much work did it do?
- What is the final potential energy of the supplies relative to
street level?
- How much work was done against friction?
- What was the average force of friction on the cable?
- A 45 kg box is pushed up a 21 m ramp at a uniform speed. The top of the ramp is 3.0 m higher than the bottom.
- What is the potential energy of the box at the top of the ramp
relative to the bottom of the ramp?
- What work was done pushing the box up the ramp if friction were negligible?
- What work was done pushing the box up the ramp if the force of friction between
the box and the ramp was 100. N?
- A 1.2 × 103 kg car driving downhill goes from an altitude of 70 m to 40 m above sea level and accelerates from 11 m/s to 23 m/s.
- How much potential energy did the car lose?
- How much kinetic energy did it gain?
- How much energy is unaccounted for?
- Where did this energy go?
- An 82 kg skydiver jumps from a height of 95 m and strikes
the ground with a speed of 6.0 m/s.
- Calculate the work done by air resistance on the skydiver.
- What was the average air resistance on the skydiver during this
jump?
- How does the magnitude of the average air resistance compare to
the weight of the skydiver?
- Top pole vaulters have a mass of about 80 kg and can clear a bar
6.0 m above the ground. Top sprinters also have a mass of about
80 kg and can cover 100 m
in 10 s.
Given these numbers, show that world record pole vaults would not be
possible without the pole contributing some elastic potential energy.
statistical
- gold-medal.txt
The accompanying data table gives the men's hundred meter dash and pole vault gold medal results for every summer Olympiad from 1896 to 2000. A crude
physical model of the pole vault assumes that all the vaulter's kinetic
energy on approach is converted to gravitational potential energy at
the top of the vault. As we all know, real world situations are never
this simple. If we compare the kinetic energy of a typical world class
sprinter to the gravitational potential energy of a similarly accomplished
pole vaulter of equal mass, we find that the two numbers are not equal.
In the earlier years of the Olympics, energy was lost is the course of
the vault; that is, the potential energy of a vaulter was always less
than the kinetic energy of a sprinter. (No surprise there. Lost energy
is inevitable.) By the end of the Twentieth Century, however, the situation
had reversed. The gravitational potential energy of gold medal pole vaulters
exceeded the kinetic energy of gold medal sprinters. It would appear
that pole vaulters have discovered a way to violate the law of conservation
of energy.
- Using the accompanying data table, produce a graph that can be
used to identify the year in which the maximum gravitational potential
energy of Olympic pole
vaulters exceeded the average kinetic energy of Olympic sprinters.
(Choose an appropriate mass for an athlete and be sure to identify
the year of the transition.)
- What changed about the sport that enabled pole vaulters to "violate" the
law of conservation of energy? (Was it the shoes? Energy bars? Performance
enhancing drugs? Obviously, it has something to
do with energy, but you need to be a bit more specific. Where is
the extra energy coming from?)
- pile-driver.txt
A group of students performed an experiment driving nails into a wooden
block. They used a 1.1091 kg pile driver released at rest from a height h above the block. Before the pile driver fell, the top of the nail was a height s1 above the block. After the pile driver fell, the top of the nail was a height s2 above the block. They repeated the experiment eight times -- four times
driving the nail with the grain of the wood and four times driving
the nail across the grain. For each trial determine …
- the work done by the falling pile
driver
- the average force exerted by the pile driver on the nail
- the average acceleration of the pile driver while in contact with the nail
- the speed of the pile driver on impact
- the duration of each impact (in milliseconds), and
- the power of each impact (in kilowatts)
| |
| Nailing with the Grain |
| h (m) |
s1 (m) |
s2 (m) |
W (J) |
F (N) |
a (m/s2) |
v (m/s) |
Δt (ms) |
P (kW) |
| 0.3060 |
0.07160 |
0.06600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.6115 |
0.06600 |
0.05675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.9180 |
0.05675 |
0.04435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.2220 |
0.04435 |
0.03060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Nailing across the Grain |
| h (m) |
s1 (m) |
s2 (m) |
W (J) |
F (N) |
a (m/s2) |
v (m/s) |
Δt (ms) |
P (kW) |
| 0.3060 |
0.06935 |
0.06670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.6115 |
0.06670 |
0.06095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.9180 |
0.06095 |
0.05370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.2220 |
0.05370 |
0.04640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Lastly, construct a graph of average force vs. penetration depth and
determine …
- the effect that the force of a pile driver has on the distance through
which a nail moves for this type of wood.
Source: Kyle Hathcox and David Ward. "The Hammer Falls: A Fresh Look at the Pile Driver." The Physics Teacher. Vol. 43, No. 7 (October 2005): 428-431.
Resources
prev | up | next