practice

  1. The diagram below shows a 10,000 kg bus traveling on a straight road which rises and falls. The horizontal dimension has been foreshortened. The speed of the bus at point A is 26.82 m/s (60 mph). The engine has been disengaged and the bus is coasting. Friction and air resistance are assumed negligible. The numbers on the left show the altitude above sea level in meters. The letters A-F correspond to points on the road at these altitudes.
     
    [magnify]
     
    1. Find the speed of the bus at point B.
    2. An extortionist has planted a bomb on the bus. If the speed of the bus falls below 22.35 m/s (50 mph) the bomb will explode. Will the speed of the bus fall below this value and explode? If you feel the bus will explode, identify the interval in which this occurs.
    3. Derive a formula to determine the speed of the bus at any altitude.

  2. [magnify]
    Two 64 kg stick figures are performing a stunt as the diagram to the right shows. One stick figure stands atop an 7.0 m escarpment. A second stick figure stands on a light, inflexible beam balanced over large rock. The first stick figure rolls a 256 kg boulder off the edge of the escarpment towards the iron beam. (Warning: These are professional stunt stick figures. Don't try this at home.)
    1. What is the theoretical limit on the height to which the second stick figure can rise? Assume that stick figures obey the law of conservation of energy.
    2. Describe how the design of this stunt alone will prevent the second stick figure from reaching the theoretical limit. Friction, air resistance, and the likelihood that either the beam or the stick figure will break are minor factors.
  3. Write something different.
  4. Write something completely different.

conceptual

  1. Four identical balls are thrown from the top of a cliff, each with the same speed. The first is thrown straight up, the second is thrown at 30° above the horizontal, the third at 30° below he horizontal, and the fourth straight down. How do the speeds and kinetic energies of the balls compare as they strike the ground …
    1. when air resistance is negligible?
    2. when air resistance is significant?

numerical

  1. A 940 W motor is used to lift 200 kg of supplies 11 m above street level to the roof of a building.
    1. If the motor ran for 24 s how much work did it do?
    2. What is the final potential energy of the supplies relative to street level?
    3. How much work was done against friction?
    4. What was the average force of friction on the cable?
  2. A 45 kg box is pushed up a 21 m ramp at a uniform speed. The top of the ramp is 3.0 m higher than the bottom.
    1. What is the potential energy of the box at the top of the ramp relative to the bottom of the ramp?
    2. What work was done pushing the box up the ramp if friction were negligible?
    3. What work was done pushing the box up the ramp if the force of friction between the box and the ramp was 100. N?
  3. A 1.2 × 103 kg car driving downhill goes from an altitude of 70 m to 40 m above sea level and accelerates from 11 m/s to 23 m/s.
    1. How much potential energy did the car lose?
    2. How much kinetic energy did it gain?
    3. How much energy is unaccounted for?
    4. Where did this energy go?
  4. An 82 kg skydiver jumps from a height of 95 m and strikes the ground with a speed of 6.0 m/s.
    1. Calculate the work done by air resistance on the skydiver.
    2. What was the average air resistance on the skydiver during this jump?
    3. How does the magnitude of the average air resistance compare to the weight of the skydiver?
  5. Top pole vaulters have a mass of about 80 kg and can clear a bar 6.0 m above the ground. Top sprinters also have a mass of about 80 kg and can cover 100 m in 10 s. Given these numbers, show that world record pole vaults would not be possible without the pole contributing some elastic potential energy.

statistical

  1. A crude physical model of the pole vault assumes that all the vaulter's kinetic energy on approach is converted to gravitational potential energy at the top of the vault. As we all know, real world situations are never this simple. If we compare the kinetic energy of an Olympic sprinter to the gravitational potential energy of an Olympic pole vaulter, we find that the two numbers are not equal. In the earlier years of the modern Olympics, the potential energy of a vaulter was always less than the kinetic energy of a sprinter. (No surprise there. Lost energy is inevitable.) Somewhere in the middle of the Twentieth Century, however, the situation reversed. The potential energy of world class pole vaulters now routinely exceeds the kinetic energy of world class sprinters. It would appear that vaulters have discovered a way to "violate" the law of conservation of energy.
    1. Using one of the data sets provided below, produce a graph that can be used to identify the year in which the maximum gravitational potential energy of Olympic pole vaulters exceeded the average kinetic energy of Olympic sprinters. (Choose an appropriate mass for an athlete and be sure to identify the year of the transition.)
    2. What changed about the sport that enabled pole vaulters to "violate" the law of conservation of energy? (Was it the shoes? Energy bars? Performance enhancing drugs? Obviously, it has something to do with energy, but you need to be a bit more specific.) Where is the extra energy coming from?
    Pick a data set for your analysis.
    1. gold-medal-dash-vault.txt
      Combined gold medal results from the men's hundred meter dash and pole vault for every one of the modern Olympiads.
    2. gold-medal-decathlon.txt
      Hundred meter dash and pole vault results of the decathlon gold medallists for every Olympiad in which this event was held.
  2. pile-driver.txt
    A group of students performed an experiment driving nails into a wooden block. They used a 1.1091 kg pile driver released at rest from a height h above the block. Before the pile driver fell, the top of the nail was a height s1 above the block. After the pile driver fell, the top of the nail was a height s2 above the block. They repeated the experiment eight times -- four times driving the nail with the grain of the wood and four times driving the nail across the grain. For each trial determine …
    1. the work done by the falling pile driver
    2. the average force exerted by the pile driver on the nail
    3. the average acceleration of the pile driver while in contact with the nail
    4. the speed of the pile driver on impact
    5. the duration of each impact (in milliseconds), and
    6. the power of each impact (in kilowatts)
       
      Nailing with the Grain
       h (m)   s1 (m)   s2 (m)   W (J)   F (N)   a (m/s2)   v (m/s)  Δt (ms)   P (kW) 
      0.3060 0.07160 0.06600            
      0.6115 0.06600 0.05675            
      0.9180 0.05675 0.04435            
      1.2220 0.04435 0.03060            
       
      Nailing across the Grain
       h (m)   s1 (m)   s2 (m)   W (J)   F (N)   a (m/s2)   v (m/s)  Δt (ms)   P (kW) 
      0.3060 0.06935 0.06670            
      0.6115 0.06670 0.06095            
      0.9180 0.06095 0.05370            
      1.2220 0.05370 0.04640            
       
    Lastly, construct a graph of average force vs. penetration depth and determine …
    1. the effect that the force of a pile driver has on the distance through which a nail moves for this type of wood.
    Source: Kyle Hathcox and David Ward. "The Hammer Falls: A Fresh Look at the Pile Driver." The Physics Teacher. Vol. 43, No. 7 (October 2005): 428-431.