Isotopes

The Physics Hypertextbook
© 1998-2008 by Glenn Elert -- A Work in Progress
All Rights Reserved -- Fair Use Encouraged

prev | up | next


Discussion

nuclear models

This page is mostly just a pile of notes. There is very little prose here.

proton πρῶτον "at first"

Even numbers of protons and even numbers of neutrons are most stable. There are no stable elements heavier than bismuth (Z = 83). Two elements below Z = 83 do not exist naturally. Surprise, surprise, they have odd atomic numbers.


[magnify]

isotopic ratios (isotopic signatures)

Tracers

Summary

Problems

practice

  1. Write something.
    • Answer it.
  2. Write something.
    • Answer it.
  3. Write something.
    • Answer it.
  4. Write something completely different.
    • Answer it.

conceptual

  1. God is in the gaps, as they say.
    The discussion highlighted the magic numbers for protons and neutrons (2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126), but it also mentioned a few gaps in the nuclides. Namely, there are no stable isotopes with mass number 5 or 8 (numbers that are important later when we study stellar nucleosynthesis) or atomic number 43 or 61 (technetium and promethium). Look closely at the graph of the nuclides and see if you can find any other interesting gaps. (Consider only elements with atomic numbers below lead Z = 82.)
    1. Are there any other atomic mass numbers with no stable isotopes (like 5 or 8)?
    2. What neutron numbers have no stable isotopes?
    3. What do all of these numbers share in common (or maybe, what do they almost all share in common)?
    4. Are there any apparently "non-magic numbers"

Resources


prev | up | next

Another quality webpage by

Glenn Elert
eglobe logo home | contact

bent | chaos | eworld | facts | physics